Legislative and Regulatory Updates
New rules stipulated in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that require insurers to publicly disclose and provide a justification for proposed health insurance rate increases of 10 percent or more went into effect Sept. 1.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on Sept. 6 issued a final rule that amends the rule issued in May on rate increase disclosure and review. The final rule clarifies that, for rate review purposes only, the definitions of “individual market” and “small group market” under state rate-filing laws would govern even if they differed from the definitions under the Public Health Service Act. The rule also clarifies that coverage sold to individuals and small groups through associations is subject to rate review on or after Nov. 1.
The CMS on Sept. 14 issued a request for comments on Section 1331 of the ACA, which gives states the option to establish basic health programs that would provide at least the essential health benefits to be established under the ACA. The comment deadline is Oct. 31.
President Obama on Sept. 28 asked the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the ACA. The president requested that the justices review the Aug. 12 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. In a split opinion, the three-judge panel based in Atlanta said that Congress and the president overstepped their authority by requiring all Americans to obtain health insurance. The Supreme Court term begins on Oct. 3. If the court decides to hear the case, a decision could be delivered sometime next year.
In another ACA-related decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on Sept. 8 ruled that Liberty University and Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli lacked standing to challenge the individual mandate under the ACA. After the ACA was passed, Virginia passed a law barring the individual mandate and then filed the suit based on the conflict between state and federal law. The strategy of using state laws to challenge a federal law had no merit, the Richmond, Va., panel argued in its decision to dismiss the case.
The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight has issued a white paper on risk-adjustment implementation. The paper focuses more on risk-adjustment methodology than on the proposed rule for the three risk-sharing mechanisms under the ACA.
The CMS has extended to Oct. 31 the deadline for comments on two proposed rules. One proposed rule relates to the establishment of exchanges and qualified health plans under the ACA. The other proposed rule sets the standards for reinsurance, risk corridors, and risk adjustment. Comments on both proposed rules, which were published in the July 15 Federal Register, originally were due on Sept. 28.
|