Lifetime Income Risk Joint Task Force issue brief in the Risky Business series exploring legislative and regulatory approaches that emphasize financial literacy and education for prospective retirees, refocusing plan design on lifetime income needs, and refocusing federal retirement policies to support lifetime income needs.()
Lifetime Income Risk Joint Task Force issue brief explaining general retirement planning considerations.()
Lifetime Income Risk Joint Task Force issue brief in the Risky Business series providing actuarial insights regarding lifetime income planning.()
Lifetime Income Risk Task Force comments to the Department of Labor regarding the proposed regulations defining fiduciaries and conflict of interest.
()
()
Pension Committee's practice note, “Selecting and Documenting Mortality Assumptions for Pensions,” revised to reflect a new mortality improvement scale (BB) published by the Retirement Plans Experience Committee (RPEC) of the Society of Actuaries in 2012, mortality table RP-2014, and mortality improvement scale MP-2014 published by the Society of Actuaries in 2014. ()
Ellen Kleinstuber, vice-chairperson of the Academy’s Pension Committee, testimony at an ERISA Advisory Council hearing on model notices and disclosures to help defined benefit plan participants understand their options when offered lump-sum distributions in a pension risk transfer transaction.()
Donald Fuerst, senior pension fellow, written testimony to the Senate Special Committee on Aging for its hearing on “Bridging the Gap: How Prepared are Americans for Retirement?”()
Pension Practice Council (PPC) letter to Treasury Department regarding the benefits of allowing qualified defined benefit pension plans to provide longevity annuities directly, rather than requiring them to purchase an insurance contract. ()
New Brunswick Shared Risk Model assessment produced by the Forward Thinking Task Force using the AGES framework, based on fundamental principles illustrating the strengths and shortcomings of retirement systems and proposals to reform them.()
South Dakota Retirement System assessment produced by the Forward Thinking Task Force using the AGES framework, based on fundamental principles illustrating the strengths and shortcomings of retirement systems and proposals to reform them. ()
Traditional Defined Benefit Plan Under Current System assessment produced by the Forward Thinking Task Force using the AGES framework, based on fundamental principles illustrating the strengths and shortcomings of retirement systems and proposals to reform them.
()USA Retirement Funds assessment produced by the Forward Thinking Task Force using the AGES framework, based on fundamental principles illustrating the strengths and shortcomings of retirement systems and proposals to reform them.()
Safe Harbor Defined Contribution Plan Under Current System assessment produced by the Forward Thinking Task Force using the AGES framework, based on fundamental principles illustrating the strengths and shortcomings of retirement systems and proposals to reform them.
()Pension Committee letter to the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department on guidance needed regarding the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014.()
Presentations from the Academy’s forum, Retirement for the AGES: Measuring for Success.()
Intersector Group notes to the Pension Practice Council from its March 2014 meeting with the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service.()
Intersector Group notes to the Pension Practice Council from its March 2014 meeting with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.()
Pension Practice Council letter to congressional leaders on proposals to raise revenue from the private sector pension system to offset unrelated spending increases.()
Pension Finance Task Force letter on proposals to extend the pension funding rules enacted under MAP-21.()
Senior Pension Fellow Donald Fuerst testimony to U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Policy hearing on the state of U.S. retirement security.
()
()
